Charles-François Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment: > (it does sound a bit overkill to me :-))
Well, it depends on what we want: - if having a stale bytecode file indefinitely is acceptable, then the '.tmp' suffix approach is OK - if not, then we should use pseudo-random files > If you go that way, you should also modify Python/import.c to use a > similar logic. I think I would use mkstemp(), but yes, that's the idea. So, what do you think? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13303> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
