Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: > I think your suggestions are all good ones, and I have incorporated > them into the file. Great :) You left some commented-out debugging prints.
> (But do note that the departures we are now making from Ned's own > copy of the tracer code — removing the commented-out debugging > statement, and the long comment, and the inheritance from object — > might make it harder to bring in changes from his own copy if he > should ever further improve it.) I’m not concerned by this. I’ve been doing merges all the time for more that a year, and having a few diverging lines is not a big deal. > I have tried to write the comments to be more informative, while also > addressing your own ideas; let me know if you like the result! I do! > Oh: and, I am continuing to use this new file in my own work on the > Python core, and it has been working fine — so no problems with the > actual code have developed over these first 3+ months of use. This is a good thing to know. I’ll let Brett take over now. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11561> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
