Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment: Do we really want to enshrine shadowing the encodings module as the one true way to do this kind of thing?
Although I guess defining a way to do it properly would be a fairly major undertaking, so perhaps blessing the encodings hack is the practical way forward... If we do that, I'd like to see a devguide patch that better explains how to generate your own coverage data for the stdlib with coverage.py, the encodings hack and the standard library coverage option. ---------- status: pending -> open _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11561> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
