David Watson <bai...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment: On Mon 23 May 2011, Gergely Kálmán wrote: > It's been a while I had a look at that code. As far as I remember though > the code is fairly decent not > taking the missing unit tests into account. There are a few todos, and > also a pretty bad bug that I've fixed > but not committed. The TODOs include better parsing of auxiliary data, > support for scatter-gather, addressed > messages. If you wish I can send you the latest patch that has the bug > fixed and applies to 3.2.
Erm, have you seen the separately-implemented patch I posted at http://bugs.python.org/file19962/baikie-hwundram-v5.diff ? It's basically complete IIRC. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6560> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
