Charles-François Natali <neolo...@free.fr> added the comment: > Oh, Linux 2.6.27+ has a SOCK_CLOEXEC option:
It's not exactly the same thing. We want to close the socket right after fork, not wait until exec (in the OP case there was no exec). > Patch looks fine to me. Is it easily testable? Easily, no. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5715> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
