On Mon, 06 May 2013 19:51:01 +0200, "V. Armando Sole" <s...@esrf.fr> wrote: > On 06.05.2013 18:44, Phil Thompson wrote: >> On Mon, 06 May 2013 18:24:59 +0200, "V. Armando Sole" <s...@esrf.fr> >> wrote: >>> On 06.05.2013 16:49, Phil Thompson wrote: >>> If so, is to remove it an absolute necessity? >> >> Nothing is absolutely necessary - but I see no reason to keep the >> old, >> verbose, error prone way of doing things. >> > > Well, my reason is thousands of lines of well-tested code that would > have to be re-written and re-tested...
So stick with PyQt4, it's not going away. Phil _______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
