I think someone else could help too for the creation of this, maybe give a hand to Phil. I would like it, but i do not use Windows and i will never do that.
Cheers. 2008/5/14 Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 5/13/2008 2:43 PM, Phil Thompson wrote: > >> >> Let me think about this a bit more. My problem wasn't with the single >> installer in itself, it was the big static build which is too inflexible and >> getting more difficult to create. >> > > My own concerns is about having PyQt and Qt installed within different > directories. The question list was meant to show how many questions could be > raised and how much confusion can be created by dividing Qt from PyQt. All > those questions ceased when you merged the two together, and I'd hope we > won't go back there. > > I'm instead totally agnostic whether to build it as a single static _qt.pyd > or with .pyd + Qt's .dll files. The former gives you a much smaller > installer file which might be a feature; the latter gives more flexibility > to final users. Either way it's fine. > -- > Giovanni Bajo > Develer S.r.l. > http://www.develer.com > _______________________________________________ > PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com > http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt > -- Gustavo A. Díaz GDNet Projects www.gdnet.com.ar
_______________________________________________ PyQt mailing list PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
