> On Jun 23, 2015, at 09:02, Petrus Hyvönen <petrus.hyvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Just a heads-up, I'm not a PyLucene user but a frequent user of JCC in > another context wrapping scientific libraries in java. I would appreciate a > Python 3 compatible JCC in the future, most libraries are now Python 3 > compatible and I think in the future this will be the python standard for > scientific computing. Of my stack that I use today I think JCC is the only > library requiring python 2.
Agreed, it would be nice to revive that jcc branch and make it current. Patches are welcome ! Andi.. > > My programming skills are limited, but can provide debugging support :) > > Regards > /Petrus > > > >> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Johan Jonkers wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >>> >>> I was wondering if there are plans to support python 3 for PyLucene. I >>> know there is an experimental Python 3 version of JCC but it is from 2010 I >>> think, so a bit outdated. We would like to migrate from python 2.7 to 3.0 >>> but we need PyLucene to work for that. Any information on this matter, like >>> perhaps a roadmap?, would be appreciated. >> >> Two things need to happen: >> - the python 3 port of JCC needs to be revived (patches are welcome) >> - the Lucene team needs to vote on releases for another release of >> PyLucene to actually happen. >> >> I prepared a PyLucene release candaidate for version 4.10.4 on March 10th >> and called for a release vote then. >> >> Only one PyLucene user responded and _no_ Lucene PMC members (besides >> myself) voted on it. Without votes, no PyLucene releases can happen. >> >> As it is, the project is dormant for lack of interest. >> >> Andi.. >> >> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Johan > > > -- > _____________________________________________ > Petrus Hyvönen, Uppsala, Sweden > Mobile Phone/SMS:+46 73 803 19 00
