On Nov 19, 2009, at 2:15, Andrew MacKinlay <admac...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 18/11/2009, at 9:38 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Andrew MacKinlay wrote:
Surely this is enough of a gotcha (got bitten by it myself), that
it could be mentioned on the documentation page? (And likely to
get more frequent I imagine, as python 2.6 uptake increases which
we might expect in the short term).
It's stated in the Makefile. When you go uncomment the section in
the Makefile that corresponds to your situation you should be
picking one of the ones for Python 2.6.
Yep, but for people running JCC in standalone mode to wrap other
java libraries, the pylucene Makefile might not be the first place
they'll go for documentation... It's not mentioned on the JCC docs
page.
Ah yes, that is correct. I see your point now. I should add an
'invoking jcc' section to the docs (or update it if there is already
one) to that effect.
Thanks !
Andi..
Andy
