On 18/11/2009, at 9:38 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Andrew MacKinlay wrote:
Surely this is enough of a gotcha (got bitten by it myself), that
it could be mentioned on the documentation page? (And likely to get
more frequent I imagine, as python 2.6 uptake increases which we
might expect in the short term).
It's stated in the Makefile. When you go uncomment the section in
the Makefile that corresponds to your situation you should be
picking one of the ones for Python 2.6.
Yep, but for people running JCC in standalone mode to wrap other java
libraries, the pylucene Makefile might not be the first place they'll
go for documentation... It's not mentioned on the JCC docs page.
Andy