He would have meant 3333. See: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3333/
On Nov 8, 9:07 am, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Ben Bangert <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Mike Orr wrote: > > >>> So when that is approved, and has an implementation (which we'll try and > >>> help with as well), we absolutely plan on having a Python 3.x version. > >>> Having a larger development team now will definitely make it a lot easier. > > > I'm sorry, I stand/sit corrected. Chris tells me PEP-333 is the current > > best choice. So I'm all on board for that, if it meets the needs. Chris > > McDonough mentions it was based on Web3 to an extent. > > Huh? PEP 333 is the original WSGI spec, which is still at 1.0 and > still has its flaws. > > -- > Mike Orr <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
