On Nov 5, 5:34 am, daniel <[email protected]> wrote: > had a quick look at pyramid ... too complex to me and not really > understand for which benefits, which could not be handled with the > lovely pylons ..
More specific criticism would be helpful. > I feel should consider whether it's time for me to step back to > django .. I always hated zope (useless ?) complexity and I love simple > way of thinking I've spent ten years using Zope. Pyramid is not Zope. It does use several packages in the zope namespace, but end users never use or need to care about those packages. They're a framework implementation detail. - C -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
