You might want to take a look at the (still-being-revised) http://docs.pylonshq.com/#faq for the general FAQ. There should be an announcement up very soon. It probably won't have much more info than that has.
For the fear of no-controllers, see: - http://docs.pylonshq.com/pyramid/dev/designdefense.html#pyramid-gets-its-terminology-wrong-mvc - http://docs.pylonshq.com/pyramid/dev/narr/handlers.html "Handlers" == Pylons 1.X controllers. For the fear of Zope, please see: - http://docs.pylonshq.com/pyramid/dev/designdefense.html#pyramid-encourages-use-of-zcml - http://docs.pylonshq.com/pyramid/dev/designdefense.html#pyramid-uses-a-zope-component-architecture-zca-registry If you spend some time reading the docs you'll see that it using the framework as an end user really has nothing at all to do with Zope. On Nov 4, 7:44 pm, "Kevin J. Smith" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Someone pointed out pyramids to me > (http://docs.pylonshq.com/pyramid/dev/narr/introduction.html) and I am a bit > confused with the relationship between pyramids and pylons. I have been > using pylons for over a year now and have never heard of pyramids (and that > includes passively following this mailing list.) From the page on pyramids > it seems to suggest that pylons post 1.0 will be using pyramids? If so, > statements like "no controllers" kind of frighten me ... and quite frankly > most things that are Zope related frighten me. > > Anybody care to clarify? > > Cheers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
