On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:08 -0200, Fernando Correa Neto wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com> wrote:
> > While it seems people generally agree that some change is required here,
> > it also seems there are a good number of people who don't like
> > "resource". Here are the arguments against it:
> >
> > - we're just switching one overloaded term ("model") for another
> > ("resource"). Zope people tend to think of static files when they
> > think of "resource", Pylons folks already have confusion about
> > "resource" due to map.resource and other usages.
> >
> > - Only the entire url represents a resource. Because
> > http://example.com/foo/bar is a valid resource does not mean that
> > http://example.com/foo is. Implying each segment is a resource would
> > be confusing.
> >
> > Alternate suggestions:
> >
> > - "traversal model"
>
> If it's an object graph, would "traversable" be bad? I know it sounds
> very zopish but, it is actually a traversable model.
"A traversable is an object in a graph.." adjectives don't make great
nouns, I'm afraid.
- C
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-de...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.
