Hi
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com> wrote:
> While it seems people generally agree that some change is required here,
> it also seems there are a good number of people who don't like
> "resource". Here are the arguments against it:
>
> - we're just switching one overloaded term ("model") for another
> ("resource"). Zope people tend to think of static files when they
> think of "resource", Pylons folks already have confusion about
> "resource" due to map.resource and other usages.
>
> - Only the entire url represents a resource. Because
> http://example.com/foo/bar is a valid resource does not mean that
> http://example.com/foo is. Implying each segment is a resource would
> be confusing.
>
> Alternate suggestions:
>
> - "traversal model"
If it's an object graph, would "traversable" be bad? I know it sounds
very zopish but, it is actually a traversable model.
-Fernando
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-de...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.
