On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 18:55 -0700, Mike Orr wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Iain Duncan<iaindun...@telus.net> wrote: > > > > Hey guys, wondering if I could request perhaps a bit more attention on > > the website to what the future plans & current work on pylons is. (I > > realize of course that now is a bit of an unwind post 0.9.7/new > > website/book time. ) > > > > I'm in the process of picking my base framework for a long range tool > > suite, and knowing what direction pylons will be taking or what will be > > coming down the pipe in the future would be helpful. I think it would be > > useful as a marketing tool for pylons too. > > > > Thanks for all the work! > > Iain > > There is a roadmap but it has gotten out of date. > > http://wiki.pylonshq.com/display/pylonscommunity/Pylons+Roadmap+to+1.0 > > I don't know what Ben has up his sleeve but I think the core is > essentially done with 0.9.7. The main incremental changes are on the > periphery: improve @validate, replace @beaker_cache, improve the > dependency documentation. I had a second job which sucked up all my > time, and I'm just now getting back into programming.I expect the > other developers have likewise been working on other stuff.
Thanks Mike. I think for marketing purposes, it's pretty important that this kind of stuff be kept up to date. A lot of people checking Pylons out are going to want to make sure it isn't just going to 'stop' even though the stability is also a huge selling point. > > There was a lot of discussion at PyCon about WSGI 2 and a new > framework. I don't think either of those have gotten anywhere. There > were some ideas to make a Pylons-like framework on top of > zope.component alongside repoze.bfg, but it seems like the main people > who wanted to integrate them each had a different idea about what > level should be integrated and why. Which means maybe it's just > better to leave them as they are because they're working. Mmm, I was following that on pypefitters and am disappointed that efforts to continue seem to be being abandoned. I sure hope those involved decide it's worthwhile after all. Thanks for the update Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
