2008/5/1 Graham Higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > (Ben, it's not clear whether you intend to "Re-do from start" or to > integrate the pre-existing pylonsdocs material in confluence where it > is relevant to the new structure,
Probably. The docs were updated for 0.9.6, and Pylons hasn't changed that much since then. > or whether there are any > contributions in the cookbook that should be included.) There is certainly material in the Cookbook that deserves to be in the official docs. But whether we'll have time to go through the Cookbook and find it before the release is another question. It would take hours to read all the Cookbook articles and evaluate them. That's part of the Cookbook sweep I'm planning when development calms down. Find the gems, consolidate redundant articles, and delete obsolete material or move it to an "old Pylons version" section. The list of articles you made will help with that, though I expect I won't get to it till the end of May. If you know a few particular Cookbook articles that are especially worth putting in the official docs, that's a different issue of course. -- Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
