On Jan 25, 2008 2:54 AM, Andrew Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But AFAIK does lxml mimick the ElementTree API. Maybe a "workaround" for the > time beeing > would be that Pylons itself uses only API features common in both packages, > and let the > users/developers decide what package (and additional features) they want.
That may be doable. I haven't looked at the code closely enough yet to determine whether WebHelpers would benefit from lxml's unique features. -- Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
