On 11/14/18 11:15 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
Feel free to choose a better name ;-) We can the mark this API as
unstable/experimental, and modify
the parameters/types. IMHO most existing parameters does not really makes sense
with external migration.
I guess it is still possible to factor out most common code to avoid code
duplication.
What do you think?
ok no problem.
I'll rework my patches next week (I'm on holiday this week).
Also, I out of idea for the qm command name.
'qm migrate_external" ?
No idea so far, sorry. Will think about it ...
'qm send' maybe?
logic wise, it is similar to 'zfs send' since it does not remove the
source, but still moves the current content?
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
