On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:12:45 +0200 (CEST) Dietmar Maurer <diet...@proxmox.com> wrote:
> > IMHO, this is simply not suitable for a virtualization storage backend. > And I don't want to limit the functionality of our software only because > there are some outdated storage boxes around. Do you mean it is a usual situation that a VM has more than 20 disks assigned? > > Or what was the suggestion exactly? > The suggestion was the following: 1) A VM or CT will be limited to have a maximum of 20 disks assigned. 2) A VM or CT will be limited to have no more than 4 active snapshots at a time. 3) One LUN is reserved for snapshot backups of CT's. -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir <at> datanom <dot> net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir <at> miras <dot> org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/games/fortune -es says: Q: What do you call a blind, deaf-mute, quadraplegic Virginian? A: Trustworthy.
pgppIRVO9cIMX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
