Great! i like this. simply is good choice! > 在 2015年8月1日，下午1:05，Dietmar Maurer <diet...@proxmox.com> 写道： > > Hi all, > > we currently try to use the original lxc configuration format to > store our container configuration, because > I initially thought we need that to use things like 'lxc-snapshot'. > But it turns out that we make snapshots using our own commands, and we > do not store snapshot config in 'lxc-snapshot' format at all. > > For example a simple config looks like: > > # cat /etc/pve/lxc/101/config > lxc.include = /usr/share/lxc/config/debian.common.conf > lxc.arch = i386 > lxc.cgroup.cpu.cfs_period_us = 100000 > lxc.cgroup.cpu.cfs_quota_us = 150000 > lxc.cgroup.cpu.shares = 1073 > lxc.cgroup.memory.limit_in_bytes = 536870912 > lxc.cgroup.memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes = 1073741824 > lxc.rootfs = loop:/var/lib/vz/images/101/vm-101-rootfs.raw > lxc.utsname = ct1 > pve.disksize = 8 > pve.volid = local:101/vm-101-rootfs.raw > lxc.network.type = veth > pve.network.bridge = vmbr0 > lxc.network.hwaddr = B6:87:08:C2:93:AB > pve.network.ip = dhcp > lxc.network.name = eth0 > lxc.network.veth.pair = veth101.0 > > As you see, this is clumsy, and can be translated to: > > arch: i386 > os: debian > cpulimit: 1.5 > cpuunits: 1073 > rootfs: local:101/vm-101-rootfs.raw,size=8 > hostname: ct1 > memory: 512 > swap: 512 > net0: name=eth0,hwaddr=B6:87:08:C2:93:AB,bridge=vmbr0,ip=dhcp > > We already expose this simpler config on the API, for example you can > get it with > > # pct config 101 > > So I wonder if we can/should simply store the configuration using that > simplified format? Any objections? > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com > http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
