Hi all, we currently try to use the original lxc configuration format to store our container configuration, because I initially thought we need that to use things like 'lxc-snapshot'. But it turns out that we make snapshots using our own commands, and we do not store snapshot config in 'lxc-snapshot' format at all.
For example a simple config looks like: # cat /etc/pve/lxc/101/config lxc.include = /usr/share/lxc/config/debian.common.conf lxc.arch = i386 lxc.cgroup.cpu.cfs_period_us = 100000 lxc.cgroup.cpu.cfs_quota_us = 150000 lxc.cgroup.cpu.shares = 1073 lxc.cgroup.memory.limit_in_bytes = 536870912 lxc.cgroup.memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes = 1073741824 lxc.rootfs = loop:/var/lib/vz/images/101/vm-101-rootfs.raw lxc.utsname = ct1 pve.disksize = 8 pve.volid = local:101/vm-101-rootfs.raw lxc.network.type = veth pve.network.bridge = vmbr0 lxc.network.hwaddr = B6:87:08:C2:93:AB pve.network.ip = dhcp lxc.network.name = eth0 lxc.network.veth.pair = veth101.0 As you see, this is clumsy, and can be translated to: arch: i386 os: debian cpulimit: 1.5 cpuunits: 1073 rootfs: local:101/vm-101-rootfs.raw,size=8 hostname: ct1 memory: 512 swap: 512 net0: name=eth0,hwaddr=B6:87:08:C2:93:AB,bridge=vmbr0,ip=dhcp We already expose this simpler config on the API, for example you can get it with # pct config 101 So I wonder if we can/should simply store the configuration using that simplified format? Any objections? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
