> > I don't want to relax that requirement now. For easy maintenance, it > > is very important that we can replace whole disks. > > It is difficult to believe that using slices (or partitions) makes > administration > difficult.
It is also difficult to believe that zfs is useful here. > Consider that using zvols and their snapshotting features gives more options > for > recovering and more flexibility for allocating resources where needed, > particularly in small clusters. It also gives more options for caching on > ssds and > for dealing with the sync writes. > These might or not might be useful depending on the application. > > I do not want or need a gui, but I also don't like the "one solution fits all" > approach taken here. I suggest you use a separate cluster for ceph then. Or simply use the tools provided by ceph if you do not need a GUI anyway. > To me this is a limiting factor without a tangible advantage. We do not set any limits on ceph - you can use the original packages like you want. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
