Am 14.07.25 um 10:42 schrieb Lukas Wagner: > On 2025-07-14 10:30, Gabriel Goller wrote:
>> Make we should change the Makefile to run `proxmox-biome check`? > > Maybe, but I think a separate make target could make more sense than > including it > in `make check`. The latter is also run during a package build process and it > would > be quite annoying to fail that because of a trivial formatting issue. We also > don't do > that for Rust, neither for clippy nor rustfmt. +1 If, we should IMO only warn on code failing a formatting check. > What definitely would make sense is to add biome format/check --write to the > `make tidy` > target, at the moment we seem to only run perltidy there. Yeah, that's still missing. Any input on target name? I used `tidy` due to correlation with perltidy's name, but would something else be more sensible here? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
