Am 27.03.25 um 12:03 schrieb Wolfgang Bumiller:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>> Am 24.03.25 um 16:43 schrieb Wolfgang Bumiller:
>>> Just a short high level nit today, will have to look more closely at
>>> this and the series the next days:
>>>
>>> There's a `new()` which takes an $scfg + $storeid.
>>>
>>> But later there are some methods taking `$self` (which usually means the
>>> thing returned from `new()`), which also get a `$storeid` as additional
>>> parameter (but without any `$scfg`). IMO the `$storeid` should be
>>> dropped there.
>>
>> Nice catch! Yeah, I think that was an oversight when I restructured in
>> an earlier version. In fact, my example implementations of those
>> functions even use $self->{storeid} already (or don't require the
>> storeid at all). I'll remove those left-overs in v6.
>
> Two more small things:
>
> The `restore_get_{guest,firewall}_config` docs should probably
> specifically mention that these are independent queries and called
> without any `restore_*_init()` calls.
>
> Thinking about this more, maybe they should be renamed.
> It might be nicer to have the `restore_` prefix used only for restore
> processes, and rename these to `archive_get_*_config()`?
> These are also used to view the config in the UI (or at least the
> `get_geust_config` one is also called from
> `Storage::extract_vzdump_config()`).
Agreed :)
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
