> Giotta Simon RUAGH via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> hat am 
> 24.10.2024 09:59 CEST geschrieben:
> > I mean, if we don't allow .raw files to be snapshotted then this problem 
> > doesn't exist ;)
> 
> Quick comment from the bleacher; Adding a mechanism to shapshot raw disks 
> might solve the TPM (tpmstate) snapshotting issue, as well as allowing 
> containers to be snapshot.
> 
> For context: 
> When using a storage that does not natively support snapshotting (NFS on 
> NetApp or similar enterprise storage, in particular), raw disks cannot be 
> snapshot. 
> Since tpmstate disks can only be stored as raw (as I understand they are just 
> a binary blob?), this makes it impossible to snapshot or (link-)clone any VMs 
> that have a TPM. This especially is an issue for current Windows clients.
> Same issue for LXC containers, as their storage format is raw only as well.
>  
> https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4693

no it does not - with the mechanisms proposed in this patch series, only the 
initial volume can be raw, if it is snapshotted, the overlays are qcow2. so 
anything reading from the volume needs qcow2 support, including swtpm. that's 
why containers are not on the table for now either..


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Reply via email to