On Friday, May 10, 2013 1:13:32 PM UTC-5, James Kyle wrote:
>
> Wait, this is at the bottom of the modules/apt/manifests/source.pp:
>
> # Need anchor to provide containment for dependencies.
> anchor { "apt::source::${name}":
> require => Class['apt::update'],
> }
>
> Could that do it? That's the Class[apt::update] ->
> Anchor[apt::source::puppetlabs] -> Exec[apt_update] cycle right?
>
>
That could and would do it. And it looks wrong, in that it appears to be
saying that Apt sources should be applied after running "apt-get update".
Nan: github fingers you as the person responsible for (the current version
of) that anchor in puppetlabs-apt. Do I misunderstand its meaning or
purpose? Do you agree that it is incorrect? (Else, why not?) If it is
indeed incorrect, then what would you say it should be?
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
