On Jan 18, 2013 11:31 AM, "jcbollinger" <john.bollin...@stjude.org> wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 18, 2013 12:11:42 PM UTC-6, iamauser wrote: >> >> What's the best practice to define two mount resources with same name, but different fstypes or ensure parameter ? In my particular case, I have the following : >> >> Two mounts defined as virtual resources with same name but different fstype. One is is ensuring present, other absent. Puppet doesn't like it, >> Looking at a bug report earlier ( http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7491 ), I followed the suggestion, but it doesn't help. puppet throws this error : >
> Instead, declare the resource once, and either set its parameters conditionally or override them, where needed, by one of the supported mechanisms for doing so. > > > John If I understand correctly the conditional would be based on the current fstype of the mount. It seems like a custom fact would be needed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
