What's the best practice to define two mount resources with same name, but 
different fstypes or ensure parameter ? In my particular case, I have the 
following :

Two mounts defined as virtual resources with same name but different 
fstype. One is is ensuring present, other absent. Puppet doesn't like it,
Looking at a bug report earlier 
( http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7491 ), I followed the suggestion, 
but it doesn't help. puppet throws this error :

Error: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: 
Puppet::Parser::AST::Resource failed with error ArgumentError: Cannot alias 
Mount[umnt_sdisk_3] to ["/data/01"] at 
/etc/puppet/modules/mname/manifests/datavers.pp:190; resource ["Mount", 
"/data/01"] already declared at 
/etc/puppet/modules/mname/manifests/datavers.pp:162 at 
/etc/puppet/modules/mname/manifests/datavers.pp:190 on node node_name


  @mount {
      "mnt_sdisk_3" :
        device => "/dev/sdb1",
        name => "/data/01",
        fstype => "auto",
        options => "defaults",
        dump => "0",
        pass => "0",
        ensure => present;
   }
 @mount {
      "umnt_sdisk_3" :
        device => "/dev/sdb1",
        name => "/data/01",
        fstype => "ext3",
        options => "defaults",
        dump => "0",
        pass => "0",
        ensure => absent;
    }

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/GT3RbAlL1nIJ.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to