On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:54 AM, ZJE <countac...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm still a little confused - is there an example of a type/provider where > this is done correctly? > Thanks! >
Not that I know of. You could be the first! =) What's confusing you? As a basic example, here is the initial change set that migrates the registry module to the convention we recommend of PuppetX::Puppetlabs::Registry https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-registry/pull/18/files As you can see, we also have to work around the $LOAD_PATH issue in #14073<http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/14073>. This won't be the case in Puppet 3.x as we'll have made modules work when distributed as Rubygems in #7788<http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7788> . -Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
