On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 at 8:39 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
> You mean "less objectionable" I presume?  I agree that classes generally 
> should not define other classes, but the guide already says that elsewhere.  
> I guess there's no harm in repeating it, if you think it worth the emphasis.

Sorry, yes - I meant that the practice was more objectionable rather than the 
phrasing.

However if it's defined elsewhere no need to repeat.

-- 

Eric Shamow
Professional Services
http://puppetlabs.com/
(c)631.871.6441
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to