On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 at 8:39 AM, jcbollinger wrote: > You mean "less objectionable" I presume? I agree that classes generally > should not define other classes, but the guide already says that elsewhere. > I guess there's no harm in repeating it, if you think it worth the emphasis.
Sorry, yes - I meant that the practice was more objectionable rather than the phrasing. However if it's defined elsewhere no need to repeat. -- Eric Shamow Professional Services http://puppetlabs.com/ (c)631.871.6441 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.