On 12-06-28 08:57 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
Hi Puppet folks,
I'm a Fedora packager, and I'm looking into packaging up some of the
modules at http://forge.puppetlabs.com/users/puppetlabs
I'm thinking through the naming scheme for modules. It looks like the
upstream modules include the creators' names as part of the package names,
which strikes me as a little verbose from the perspective of Fedora
packaging.
For example, the Puppetlabs' mysql module RPM would (in theory) be called
"puppetmodule-puppetlabs-mysql". That's a mouthful. Any chance we could
have the Puppet Labs' modules be considered "canonical" modules on the
Forge, and then strip away the puppetlabs vendor name? Any other ideas
welcome.
I'm considering doing the same for Debian. I haven't researched a
naming scheme yes however I would expect something like
puppetmodule-puppetlabs-mysql or puppet-module-puppetlabs-mysql would apply.
I'd be reluctant to call it puppet-module-mysql unless it was actually
bundled within puppet.
--
Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc.
Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode)
Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter:
https://twitter.com/pabelanger
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
