On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Jo Rhett <jrh...@netconsonance.com> wrote:
I've looked at the code. It requires changing the triggers to have > attributes, which is honestly a fairly trivial change and likely backwards > compatible with anything today, too. Look at Puppet::Relationship.match? () > -- it's accepts the idea of event types, but only has triggers for > :ALL_EVENTS or :NONE. > > That or else could be replaced with specific event types being passed > quite easily. Then each object would have to be modified to accept a > revised syntax in the situation (optional) where only specific types are > desired. > > It really doesn't appear to be a large change. > I think the path forward at this point is probably to put together a rough patch that does what you're looking for. In my experience the puppetlabs guys are very helpful about answering questions and helping improve patches once a pull request/issue has been raised. I'd be shocked if they didn't at least give you some solid feedback on getting this included. Thanks, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
