On 23 March 2011 10:21, Nigel Kersten <ni...@puppetlabs.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Stefan Schulte > <stefan.schu...@taunusstein.net> wrote: > > > So splitting the mounttype can lead to better reports when puppet sync > > mountpoint and entry in fstab seperatly. Because I'm lazy I'll propably > > write a define (maybe I will call it mount) that will create two > > resources for the two new types. > > If we did decide to make this change, we would probably try to get > such a define/wrapped type that preserved existing semantics into core > as well, so people could choose to use it. >
Creating a define to wrap the two resources is essentially option 3 then, isn't it? +1 option 3 John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
