On Mar 21, 2011, at 1:39 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
>
> On Mar 21, 3:15 pm, Brian Gallew <g...@gallew.org> wrote:
>> It has occurred to me that another way of doing this would be to use defines
>>
>> define kludge($sudo_add_rule=undef) {
>> node { "${name}":
>> class {sudoers: additional_rules => [$sudo_add_rule}}
>> }
>> }
>>
>> The beauty of this is that it gets around the traditional problem of node
>> inheritance: that including classes in any inherited node requires adding
>> extra helper classes just to enable value overrides.
>
> Does it actually work to declare a node inside a define? I wouldn't
> have expected so, but if it does then that might prove useful to know.
That will teach me to jump in before testing: no, it doesn't work.
There goes another bright idea.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
