On Jan 23, 2011, at 5:58 PM, eshamow wrote:

> I can tell you that for me, and for my group, it's a halfway step
> between reloading Puppet and watching the logs, and a full --debug --
> no-daemonize run.
> 
> So for instance, when they're troubleshooting a bug in a newly-written
> or modified class, I suggest a puppetd -tv run to just output the
> errors and successes...and if you see an error, you could then follow
> up with the more verbose --debug to get at what Puppet was trying to
> do that generated it, provided that you didn't get enough from the
> former.
> 
> It might be wise to consider combining a bunch of similar options
> (verbose, test, debug, etc) into a "verbose" with levels of output --
> either v1, v2, v3 or vv, vvv, vvvv, etc.

Just for clarification, "--test" isn't a level of messages.  It just causes 
"--verbose" to be added.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to