--- R.I.Pienaar
On 17 Dec 2009, at 19:19, "Al @ Lab42" <lab42...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 Dic, 17:28, David Schmitt <da...@dasz.at> wrote: > > I find more difficult to write and control this logic in custom facts > splattered in different modules, rather that in a single > "infrastructural" class where all variables are defined according to > custom logic and groupings, or, as I generally do, in a nodes' > inheritance structure, where there are intermediate node that can > define networks or geographical locations or whatever groups that are > inherited by host nodes. > > Excuse my ignorance, if someone can enlighten and convince me on the > advantages of placing the logic of a puppet infrastructure in facts, > please do it. > I like to redefine my beliefs :-D > I use extlookup with sane defaults for any and all configurable variables in classes, it makes all of this easier Julian Simpson is hacking on extlookup at the moment we should soon have a pligins system so you can replace csv with whatever you like, there is some support from RL which suggests it will make it into puppet base when we are done with this process > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
