On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
drmikecrowe <drmikecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> That's very close to where I am now, except we use mercurial instead
> of svn. :)
>
> However, I'm more searching for non-same hosts (i.e. no SAN). I'm
> basically asking the question of puppet managed ( file
> { source=>"puppet://.... } ) vs. another scheme.
>
> My hunch is I do NOT want puppet managing 1000's of files and
> propagating them. Maybe have puppet monitor a version file, and when
> that changes, execute an rsync to bring the directories into sync.
I have similar needs but have not found any satisfying solution yet.
Maybe this feature might prove useful, once it is implemented:
http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/184
I imagine this would allow us to do something like this:
file { "/var/www/whatever/":
ensure => "r123",
source => "svn://myproject.com/svn/repository/"
}
Marc
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
