On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:42 PM, David Lutterkort <lut...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I'd recommend sticking with the EPEL packages, simply since there are > more and more varied uses (and therefore more testing) of them than for > the MRG stuff - even if the MRG packages are, for all intents and > purposes, identical to the EPEL ones; and we'll definitely push any bugs > and bug fixes for MRG back upstream. EPEL is up to 0.24.7 nowadays, so it's even newer than the MRG one. Didn't know MRG used puppet for configuration, but it makes a whole lot of sense to do so :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
