On Feb 1, 2009, at 10:42 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Paul Lathrop
> <p...@tertiusfamily.net> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think that belongs in facter; it belongs in the fact itself.
>
> Sure, but should everyone have to write the same code to do it?
>
> Why not have a simple declaration in your fact that gives you the
> behavior you want?
I agree; time-to-live is pretty fundamental, and should be
straightforward to add.
--
Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.
--G. K. Chesterton
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
