On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Paul Lathrop <p...@tertiusfamily.net> wrote: > > I don't think that belongs in facter; it belongs in the fact itself.
Sure, but should everyone have to write the same code to do it? Why not have a simple declaration in your fact that gives you the behavior you want? > > Just my .02 > > --Paul > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Sam Rowe <s...@samrowe.com> wrote: >> >> Oh and one other thing about 'facter.d' it'd be cool if there was some >> way to say that a given fact (or set of facts) is cache-able. Perhaps >> your fact is resource intensive to discover and doesn't change much. >> It'd be cool to have a built-in facility in facter that says "if you >> just booted, find out this fact, otherwise use the old answer." >> >> > >> > > > > -- Nigel Kersten Systems Administrator Tech Lead - MacOps --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
