On Oct 8, 1:20 am, David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [jumping in late, haven't read the thread] > > dd-b schrieb: > > > Having to think about which levels of change need to be > > committed all the time is a high-cost high-risk activity. > > You are 100% right. > > > The fact that CVS and Subversion make using temporary branches really > > ugly and error-prone doesn't help, either. I haven't yet encountered > > any place that uses branches for anything smaller than multi-week sub- > > projects. > > That's why the git-people say that svn is broken. In git you cannot work > _without_ having a branch.
I thought that's what their materials were saying (quick reads, and I haven't played with the actual software). I can get behind that approach. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
