[jumping in late, haven't read the thread] dd-b schrieb: > Having to think about which levels of change need to be > committed all the time is a high-cost high-risk activity.
You are 100% right. > The fact that CVS and Subversion make using temporary branches really > ugly and error-prone doesn't help, either. I haven't yet encountered > any place that uses branches for anything smaller than multi-week sub- > projects. That's why the git-people say that svn is broken. In git you cannot work _without_ having a branch. Regards, DavidS --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
