On 03/06/2015 12:20 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > > If, for some reason, /export/home was *not* controlled by Puppet, then I > would want User['foo'[ to autorequire /export as well as /export/home.
Hi Trevor, I see your example, but don't really see the value in requiring /export. If /export/home appears through a mount, then the user should make the User require the mount resource explicitly, not its mount point. If there is no mount resource (autofs), then requiring the mount point adds comparatively little safety, at the cost of complexity and potential surprises. Cheers, Felix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/54F9A1D6.8060107%40alumni.tu-berlin.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
