On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 4:34:43 PM UTC-6, Stefan Schulte wrote:
> I am not saying that the current behaviour is correct/better or that your > argument is invalid (you have a good point IMHO). I just wanted to point > out that it is implemented for quite a while now and personally I am not > aware that this caused any problems. > Understood. My rather terse commentary was intended to communicate that although I think that autorequirement is inappropriate, I am not interested in mounting a likely-futile campaign to get it removed again, and I do not intend to engage in an angry diatribe about what a terrible thing it is for Puppet to have such an obvious and horrendous flaw -- and how dare you personally have anything to do with implementing it? ( :-) ) If it were of surpassing importance to me that all my tools were designed and behaved exactly exactly as I liked, then I would have no choice but to write them myself. Although I can be impassioned, in the end, I'm a lot more pragmatic than that. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/83c8406c-fd1c-40bc-abb5-2ed0831dc038%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
