I do agree, it is possibly bad however, my boss says that html stays. Dallas
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ryan Camick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:38 PM Subject: RE: Hardening against attacks? > On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 14:22, Lucas Albers wrote: > > I don't agree with using html mail instead of plain text messages. > > Plain text is more secure then html mail, html can have javascript and > > iframe exploits in it. > > In Kevin's defense, what he wrote was meant to discourage HTML emails, > such as the one posted by the person who started this thread. He just > worded it oddly ;) Everyone who has an opinion on the subject should > agree with you :) > > Kevin McConnell wrote: > "Also, sending and receiving HTML mail as opposed to > plain text ( I also picked this one for obvious > reasons )." > > -- > Powered by Red Hat Linux 8.0 > > > > -- > Psyche-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
