On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 14:22, Lucas Albers wrote: > I don't agree with using html mail instead of plain text messages. > Plain text is more secure then html mail, html can have javascript and > iframe exploits in it.
In Kevin's defense, what he wrote was meant to discourage HTML emails, such as the one posted by the person who started this thread. He just worded it oddly ;) Everyone who has an opinion on the subject should agree with you :) Kevin McConnell wrote: "Also, sending and receiving HTML mail as opposed to plain text ( I also picked this one for obvious reasons )." -- Powered by Red Hat Linux 8.0
