Yeah!

👍

Matthias Fäth
Calle San Ramon 5
ES- 46780 Oliva
Handy DE: +49 171 98 32 175
Movile ES: +34 682 33 94 02
Email: m.fa...@gmx.de


Am Do., 11. Mai 2023 um 17:39 Uhr schrieb Ben Pfaff <b...@cs.stanford.edu>:

> Multiple response features get requested fairly often, so I do plan to
> work on them. It will still be months, most likely, before I get to it.
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 8:25 AM <curtis.sz...@hongkong.messefrankfurt.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, I am new to PSPP and we are assessing if we can switch from SPSS
>> (existing customer of) to PSPP. We found PSPP is great and almost meets all
>> our requirements, but there is one possible blocker -  PSPP does not
>> support crosstabs with multiple response questions currently.  Attached is
>> an example based on SPSS together with a data file – it serves to
>> illustrate the kind of multiple response support we need.
>>
>>
>>
>> I found on pspp archives a recent thread
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/pspp-users/2023-04/msg00011.html>
>> (dated in 17 Apr 2023) on the topic, which wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>>
>> *From:* Ben Pfaff <b...@cs.stanford.edu>
>> *Sent:* Monday, 17 April 2023 06:02
>> *To:* Matt Balogh <mbal...@bloggs.id.au>
>> *Cc:* pspp-users@gnu.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Multiple response tables
>>
>>
>>
>> PSPP doesn't support multiple response tables yet. CTABLES will be
>> supported in the upcoming release, but multiple response variables aren't
>> part of the support yet.
>>
>>
>>
>> Tables can be given headings. The documentation for CTABLES covers it.
>>
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>>
>> It gave a hope that the support is coming soon, however, it said
>> ‘multiple response variables aren’t part of the support yet.’  May I
>> clarify if it meant even with the upcoming release, the CTABLES support for
>> multiple response variable/question will still not be ready? If it won’t be
>> ready in next release, then any idea when it might be ready?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Curtis
>>
>

Reply via email to