Sorry, I forgot to add "END IF." Here's where it would go:

DO IF(P5=2 or P6=2 or P7=2).
   COMPUTE Var0001 = 1.
ELSE IF (P8=1).
   COMPUTE Var0001 = 2.
ELSE.
   COMPUTE Var0001 = 3
END IF.
EXECUTE.

On 10/27/2017 11:52 AM, Alan Mead wrote:
> You have the syntax wrong. I imagined variable V1.  I have no idea is
> this accomplishes what you want, it just corrects the syntax to
> illustrate how you have the syntax wrong. The spacing before the
> RECODE/COMPUTE statements is just to make it easier to read.
>
> DO IF(P5=2 or P6=2 or P7=2).
>    RECODE V1 (2=1) INTO Var0001.
> ELSE IF (P8=1).
>   RECODE P8 (1=2) into Var0001.
> ELSE.
>    COMPUTE Var0001=3
> EXECUTE.
>
> Also, I don't think you need to use RECODE:
>
> DO IF(P5=2 or P6=2 or P7=2).
>    COMPUTE Var0001 = 1.
> ELSE IF (P8=1).
>    COMPUTE Var0001 = 2.
> ELSE.
>    COMPUTE Var0001 = 3
> EXECUTE.
>
> On 10/27/2017 11:45 AM, Betsabé Cohen wrote:
>> Hi Alan: 
>> I wrote it like this and still result error: 
>> DO IF(P5=2 or P6=2 or P7=2) RECODE (2=1) INTO Var0001
>> ELSE IF (P8=1) 
>> RECODE P8 
>> (1=2) 
>> ELSE COMPUTE 3
>> EXECUTE.
>>
>>
>> *
>> *
>> *LIC. BETSABE LAILA COHEN*
>> betsabe.co...@gmail.com  <mailto:betsabe.co...@gmail.com>
>> CEL: +54911 5701 3993
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-10-23 17:45 GMT-03:00 Alan Mead <am...@alanmead.org
>> <mailto:am...@alanmead.org>>:
>>
>>     Let's assume you have variables X1, x2, x3, etc. and you wish to
>>     create a new variable cond with values like 1, 2, 3, etc. then do
>>     one of these:
>>
>>     if( x1 = 1 or x2 = 3) cond = 1.
>>     if( (x2 = 1 and x4=1) or x3 = 1) cond = 2.
>>     etc....
>>     execute.
>>
>>     OR, do this:
>>
>>     do if( x1 = 1 or x2 = 3).
>>       compute cond = 1.
>>     else if( (x2 = 1 and x4=1) or x3 = 1).
>>       compute cond = 2.
>>     else.
>>       compute cond = -1.
>>     end if.
>>     execute.
>>
>>     The main difference is that the second method assures that cond
>>     is assigned something. But unassigned values will be system
>>     missing, so maybe that's better.
>>
>>     If you had a single variable that you wanted to create a new
>>     variable with grouped values, then RECODE would be easier but
>>     AFAIK it only works on values from a single variable.
>>
>>     -Alan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 10/23/2017 3:37 PM, Betsabé Cohen wrote:
>>>     Hi john and Alan 
>>>     I’d like to create a new variable where, given certain codes in
>>>     certain variables you get other codes in the new variable: if
>>>     respondent answer code 1 un variables 5,6 or 7 so in the new
>>>     variable it should be code 1, if respondent gets code 1 in
>>>     variable 8 it should be code 2 in the new variable but if
>>>     respondent gets code 2 it should be code 3 in the new variable.
>>>     I wonder sintaxis should be condtional if do, but i dont know...
>>>
>>>     El El lun, 23 oct. 2017 a las 14:03, Alan Mead
>>>     <am...@alanmead.org <mailto:am...@alanmead.org>> escribió:
>>>
>>>         And if John's explanation is insufficient, please explain
>>>         what you are trying to do. A recode statement (if your
>>>         conditions depend on values of one variable) or compute
>>>         statements in IF or DO IF blocks (otherwise) may be
>>>         necessary to accomplish what you want.
>>>
>>>         -Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>         On 10/23/2017 12:00 PM, John Darrington wrote:
>>>>         In PSPP, the simplest way to create a new variable, and assign 
>>>> values
>>>>         to it derived from existing variables is using the COMPUTE command.
>>>>         For example if you have existing variables v1, v2 and v3, you could
>>>>         create a new variable as follows:
>>>>
>>>>         compute newVar = v1 or v2 or v3.
>>>>
>>>>         (don't forget the . at the end)
>>>>
>>>>         J'
>>>>
>>>>         On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 01:12:03PM -0300, Betsab?? Cohen wrote:
>>>>              Hi everyone:
>>>>              I'm a recent user of PSPP and i'm trying to create a new 
>>>> variable from
>>>>              three other variables using a conditional. In Excel i would 
>>>> use IF and OR
>>>>              functions but i don't know what should i used in pspp 
>>>> sintaxys:
>>>>              
>>>>              The idea is to create a new variable as follows:
>>>>              
>>>>              
>>>>              NEW Variable "Condicion_Actividad"
>>>>              Existing variables
>>>>              Cod.1= Var5=1 or Var6=1 or Var7=1
>>>>              Cod.2= Var8=1
>>>>              Cod.3= Var8=2
>>>>              
>>>>              Thanks in advance.
>>>>              
>>>>              Betsy
>>>>              
>>>>              
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         Pspp-users mailing list
>>>>         Pspp-users@gnu.org <mailto:Pspp-users@gnu.org>
>>>>         https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
>>>>         <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users>
>>>
>>>         -- 
>>>
>>>         Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
>>>         President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
>>>
>>>         science + technology = better workers
>>>
>>>         http://www.alanmead.org
>>>
>>>         I've... seen things you people wouldn't believe...
>>>         functions on fire in a copy of Orion.
>>>         I watched C-Sharp glitter in the dark near a programmable gate.
>>>         All those moments will be lost in time, like Ruby... on... Rails... 
>>> Time for Pi.
>>>
>>>                   --"The Register" user Alister, applying the famous 
>>>                     "Blade Runner" speech to software development
>>>
>>>     -- 
>>>     *
>>>     *
>>>     *LIC. BETSABE LAILA COHEN*
>>>     betsabe.co...@gmail.com  <mailto:betsabe.co...@gmail.com>
>>>     CEL: +54911 5701 3993
>>>
>>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>
>>     Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
>>     President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
>>
>>     science + technology = better workers
>>
>>     http://www.alanmead.org
>>
>>     I've... seen things you people wouldn't believe...
>>     functions on fire in a copy of Orion.
>>     I watched C-Sharp glitter in the dark near a programmable gate.
>>     All those moments will be lost in time, like Ruby... on... Rails... Time 
>> for Pi.
>>
>>               --"The Register" user Alister, applying the famous 
>>                 "Blade Runner" speech to software development
>>
>>
>
> -- 
>
> Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
> President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
>
> science + technology = better workers
>
> http://www.alanmead.org
>
> I've... seen things you people wouldn't believe...
> functions on fire in a copy of Orion.
> I watched C-Sharp glitter in the dark near a programmable gate.
> All those moments will be lost in time, like Ruby... on... Rails... Time for 
> Pi.
>
>           --"The Register" user Alister, applying the famous 
>             "Blade Runner" speech to software development
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pspp-users mailing list
> Pspp-users@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users

-- 

Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
President, Talent Algorithms Inc.

science + technology = better workers

http://www.alanmead.org

I've... seen things you people wouldn't believe...
functions on fire in a copy of Orion.
I watched C-Sharp glitter in the dark near a programmable gate.
All those moments will be lost in time, like Ruby... on... Rails... Time for Pi.

          --"The Register" user Alister, applying the famous 
            "Blade Runner" speech to software development

_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users

Reply via email to