That is great news, so I changed the topic to Macros. @all: 1. How is your view on that? For recall: Frans promised to support us with macro code which could serve as "replacement" for certain CTABLES functions once PSPP would support macros.
2. How would you propose to proceed on that? Is there already anybody out there who has done some work on macros or is familiar with the process to add functionality AND thinks that is a project worthwhile? @Frans: I guess you could be the person to define the "wishlist" of macro functions, once we found a way to organize that? Matthias 2015-11-16 1:26 GMT+01:00 Ben Pfaff <b...@cs.stanford.edu>: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:01:43PM +0000, Charles Johnson wrote: > > > 3. Maybe Frans idea about implementing !Macros could serve as a > > > workaround. I think that might be worthwhile to discuss. Any opinions > > > on that? > > > > From my point of view, the implementation of macro is very different > > and deserves a discussion in itself. > > The implementation of macros is a big project but I'd say that it's > simpler than SPV or CTABLES. It's also completely independent of either > of those. >
_______________________________________________ Pspp-users mailing list Pspp-users@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
